Newest Members
hans32, SilentNoLonger, masryt, feartheroo, Xzander32244
12130 Registered Users
Today's Birthdays
ACLover94 (50), Henry (40), james 1959 (55), Johnny90 (24), poliwog (44), Starbuck (38)
Who's Online
4 registered (Frustrated, CafeMan, I Want 2 Thrive, 1 invisible), 57 Guests and 5 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
12130 Members
73 Forums
62555 Topics
438323 Posts

Max Online: 418 @ 07/02/12 07:29 AM
Twitter
Topic Options
#439333 - 06/27/13 03:20 AM when does LGBT get to start being picky re:heroes?
Jacob S Offline
Member
MaleSurvivor

Registered: 01/01/13
Posts: 550
Am I alone in being uncomfortable when people like Walt Whitman, Oscar Wilde, Alan Ginsberg, Harvey Milk, and Liberace are seen as heroes and pioneers in the gay community? I'm not calling them pedophiles like some erroneously do, but every one of them saw nothing wrong with pursuing relationships with boys in their mid-teens or younger. I understand we have a different culture than we had even 30 years ago, but surely there comes a point where the LGBT community can afford to cast off "heroes" who were not interested in egalitarian relationships but rather ones in which a pretty extreme power differential was existing.

I know the counter-argument is that until very recently heterosexual men also tended to marry woman who were quite a bit younger and so the same age differential existed. And I think that is equally as disgusting. I don't think those people should really be lauded as heroes either. But today while watching the coverage of the supreme court cases (which I am very happy about), all of the above names came up at one point or another as pioneers. And to me, it put a taint on the day. Aren't there enough LGBT pioneers throughout history that we don't need to include ephebophiles just to fluff up the ranks? The adult-teen relationship that these men promoted is not at all equatable to the loving same-sex marriages that today celebrates. Whitman encouraged his younger lovers to move on into heterosexuality after a certain age. Wilde saw nothing wrong with teenage prostitutes. Ginsberg famously argued that police intervention was worse than "consensual intergenerational affections" (if you believe Dworkin, Ginsberg's interest in prepubescent sex went far beyond academic inquiry into "personal rights", though Ginsberg denied that). Milk serially dated people decades younger than him. Liberace never showed much interest in being monogamous or committed to young Scott Thorson.

What I'm getting at is that among these specific men, their attraction seems to have been much more about a power dynamic than about lifelong love. This is exactly the kind of underworld exploitation that bringing homosexual relationships into the protection of law hopes to work against. Homosexual marriage is about two people who are welcomed into the fabric of society with equal rights and equal protections. While I'm not making a legal argument here, I don't think that people who spent their lives seducing young underprivileged boys should any way be called forerunners to the victories won today. If anything, they are the kind of people that we hope young men will now have the societal acceptance and legal rights to be able to avoid.
_________________________
"As long as the child within is not allowed to become aware of what happened to him or her, a part of his or her emotional life will remain frozen . . . all appeals to love, solidarity, and compassion will be useless."
-- Alice Miller

Top
#439372 - 06/27/13 04:45 PM Re: when does LGBT get to start being picky re:heroes? [Re: Jacob S]
bodyguard8367 Offline
Member
MaleSurvivor

Registered: 05/16/12
Posts: 1159
Loc: ""
""


Edited by bodyguard8367 (02/27/14 04:55 PM)

Top
#439558 - 06/30/13 12:06 AM Re: when does LGBT get to start being picky re:heroes? [Re: Jacob S]
kcinohio Offline
Member
MaleSurvivor

Registered: 06/06/12
Posts: 225
Loc: Ohio
While I get the uneasiness regarding the specific age group mentioned here, issue seems like an "age of consent" thing to me rather than strictly LGBT. Don't know if there's some graduated series of ranges for "age of consent and age of partners" concept out there or not, but maybe that's what the first post suggests as ideal. Maybe there are already some organizations out there working on this concept.

Personally, once two people are over 21 or so, I don't have issue with those partners agreeing to relationships even when there are significant age differences. Finding a loving relationship is challenging enough without putting expectations of some fixed "age appropriate" range to it, in my opinion. If a 30-year-old and a 55-year-old find love together, who am I to tell them it isn't right?



Edited by kcinohio (06/30/13 12:06 AM)

Top


Moderator:  ModTeam 

I agree that my access and use of the MaleSurvivor discussion forums and chat room is subject to the terms of this Agreement. AND the sole discretion of MaleSurvivor.
I agree that my use of MaleSurvivor resources are AT-WILL, and that my posting privileges may be terminated at any time, and for any reason by MaleSurvivor.