Attorney Rominger, I believe, is being overly optimistic on his view of appellate review. He would claim that the so-called "tainted evidence" would have been so devastating as to unduly prejudice the jury on all other counts. I believe his interpretation is not based in reality. Courts of Appeals rarely, if ever, overturn cases on this kind of appeal and even if the court would -- it would try to limit the scope of the ruling...Hope that helps to answer your questions...If you or others have more...I will try to give you a translation or interpretation of process or procedure...Thanks...