Newest Members
JayNL, Robert Barrett, lostsoul824, beatcook, MassGuy
12279 Registered Users
Today's Birthdays
cainrafael (28), GL (67), JohnP725 (66), Lloydy (61), Marie-TwoOfUs (35)
Who's Online
1 registered (WontGiveUp), 34 Guests and 5 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
12279 Members
73 Forums
63183 Topics
441807 Posts

Max Online: 418 @ 07/02/12 07:29 AM
Twitter
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#286756 - 05/08/09 03:07 PM The Obama Thread
Hauser Offline
Member
MaleSurvivor

Registered: 11/12/05
Posts: 2962
Loc: United States












Top
#286757 - 05/08/09 03:09 PM Re: The Obama Thread [Re: Hauser]
Hauser Offline
Member
MaleSurvivor

Registered: 11/12/05
Posts: 2962
Loc: United States











Top
#286808 - 05/09/09 12:51 AM Re: The Obama Thread [Re: Hauser]
Trucker51 Offline
Member
MaleSurvivor

Registered: 05/20/08
Posts: 2826
Loc: Denver, CO
The biggest difference between #43 and #44 is that #44 enjoys a 2/3rds approval rating, versus a bit over a 1/4th approval rating for #43. What are you upset about Allen??? Your silver is up to $14/ounce!!! And my Ultra Clean/UCTT is up 150% since late March!!! It is still a bargain @ $2.50/share. Even my 2000 shares of my largest mutual fund are up nearly 30% since I bought back in!!!

Now if my Iraqi Dinars would just mature I would be rich!!!

Go Barack!!! Go silver!!! A little inflation is good!!!

_________________________
"We stay here, we die here. We've got to keep moving". Trucker Mark



Top
#287214 - 05/12/09 04:15 PM Re: The Obama Thread [Re: Trucker51]
ComicBookGuy Offline
Member
MaleSurvivor

Registered: 02/08/09
Posts: 443
Loc: London, England
Er...so you don't like him? smile

On a serious note, he has been insanely overhyped politically rather like our Tony Blair in the 90s, so a backlash was inevitable.



Edited by ComicBookGuy (05/12/09 04:16 PM)
_________________________
- CBG

Top
#287273 - 05/12/09 11:28 PM Re: The Obama Thread [Re: ComicBookGuy]
Trucker51 Offline
Member
MaleSurvivor

Registered: 05/20/08
Posts: 2826
Loc: Denver, CO
How could anyone else have done a better job? Certainly you don't think that John McCain and his petite sidekick could have done a better job, do you? And as for Ron Paul, if he had won do you think that the Congress would have just rolled-over like a dog that wants you to scratch his belly??? My guess is that Ron Paul would have been lucky to get any of his agenda through Congress. Just today they said that Social Security will be bankrupt by 2037, when I am 80. What will I do then, get a job at Walmart as a door-greeter???

Gee Alan, the guy has been in power 3 & 1/2 months and you already want to impeach him, for what??? So far his projected budget deficit isn't as bad as his predecessor's. If McCain had been elected with Democratic control of both houses of Congress what would have been different? Maybe GM would be bankrupt by now, Bank of America too? What good will that do? We throw lots of people out of work, then tax revenues, prices, and wages fall, as the deficit balloons out of control, eventually causing deflation then inflation.

The real problem was already well underway before President Obama ever took office. Everyone was living on borrowed money, large amounts of it borrowed from inflated values on real estate. All of these ARMs started to reset causing massive numbers of foreclosures, which eventually caused a whole number of problems, some of which came about from lax regulation and oversight. Available credit dried-up and continues to evaporate. And this year there are projected to be even more residential ARMs re-setting than last year, combined with a firestorm of commercial real-estate defaults. Banks aren't lending, they are desperately trying to shore-up reserves just in-case of the worst-case scenario. And your Ron Paul wants every institution that is in trouble to fail? You want 50 million people out of work? How will that help the budget deficit? Just abolish the Federal Reserve and go back onto the gold standard, thereby somehow wiping-out $12 Trillion of debt?

How about everyone holding that $12 Trillion of debt. You think that they will allow it? My guess is that either we had better back President Obama and the Congress and get back to work and spending, or put lots of volunteer energy into electing minority party candidates for Congress in the mid-term elections. All of the moaning about the first 100 days of Obama is counter-productive. You want something else, get out there and try to do something about it. You have just under 18 months until the mid-term elections, and the mainstream Republicans are badly divided still finger-pointing over their losses. Maybe you and the other Ron Paul supporters can get enough minority party candidates elected in the 2010 elections to begin to make some kind of difference. You might be able to draw some of the disaffected Republicans away from their own party, maybe some of the more moderate Democrats too.

Who are Ron Paul's choices for the House and Senate in 2010??? Maybe you could post their names on the side of your apartment where a couple of thousand people per day could see them!!! If you get a billboard alongside the Boulder Turnpike you might get 100,000 viewers per day. You will need some financial backers, because billboards aren't cheap. C'mon, get out there and go door-to-door pounding the pavement.

Hauser for Congress!!!???

_________________________
"We stay here, we die here. We've got to keep moving". Trucker Mark



Top
#287347 - 05/13/09 01:45 PM Re: The Obama Thread [Re: Trucker51]
michael banks Offline


Registered: 06/12/08
Posts: 1755
Loc: Mojave Desert, Ca
Mark,

If you can get Allan to run for congress and I will move to Colorado.Just so I can vote for him. Make him part of the machine he so dispises. If we can get him elected at the mid term elections. He will have 2 yrs experience in congress and he can run for President against Obama in 2012.

Hauser for President.

Mike

_________________________
To own one's shadow is the highest moral act of a human.
-Robert Johnson-

"IT ought never be forgotten that the past is the parent of the future" John C. Calhoun

WOR Alumni Sequoia 2009

Top
#287402 - 05/13/09 09:08 PM Re: The Obama Thread [Re: michael banks]
Hauser Offline
Member
MaleSurvivor

Registered: 11/12/05
Posts: 2962
Loc: United States
Mark, get ready to duck, cuz this aint gonna be pretty.


Top
#287642 - 05/15/09 09:04 PM Re: The Obama Thread [Re: Hauser]
Trucker51 Offline
Member
MaleSurvivor

Registered: 05/20/08
Posts: 2826
Loc: Denver, CO
Oh my Gawd, this reminds me of an afternoon when I was in grade school, behind my folk's old house, where a backhoe had just dug a big hole for a new foundation. It was my friends and I against some other neighborhood boys in dirt clod wars. Back and forth across the pit the dirt clods flew from behind piles of dirt, the one side never seeing the other side. After a few glancing blows were inflicted the victors cheered while the vanquished went scurrying for the safety of home.

Got to start somewhere....Hauser for City Council???

_________________________
"We stay here, we die here. We've got to keep moving". Trucker Mark



Top
#287646 - 05/15/09 09:11 PM Re: The Obama Thread [Re: Trucker51]
michael banks Offline


Registered: 06/12/08
Posts: 1755
Loc: Mojave Desert, Ca
Mark,

No I think he should run for the school board.
You know what a public school supporter he is.

Hauser for the Denver school board.

Mike

_________________________
To own one's shadow is the highest moral act of a human.
-Robert Johnson-

"IT ought never be forgotten that the past is the parent of the future" John C. Calhoun

WOR Alumni Sequoia 2009

Top
#290388 - 06/05/09 11:14 AM Re: The Obama Thread [Re: michael banks]
Hauser Offline
Member
MaleSurvivor

Registered: 11/12/05
Posts: 2962
Loc: United States
Mark, I will not sully my dignity by participating in a discussion that assumes that Mr. Obama is doing anything besides rewarding and enriching his politically connected friends. He is not here to help we the people. If he was, he would stop his present course of turning this country into a Marxist-State. He's a player in the two-party dictatorship that we the people have all too readily embraced, with only a distinct minority of people who are actually studiously informed and reflect that in their voting activities.

Here is a scary example of Obama-voters answering questions about our country and their overall knowledge of politics. Warning!!!! This might offend you if you voted for Mr. Obama. This is not just a scathing indictment of democratic voters, no, it's an indictment of the American Voter in general.



To sum up this discussion, I will let the good Doctor and Representative from Texas, Ron Paul, speak for me:





Top
#290577 - 06/07/09 12:20 AM Re: The Obama Thread [Re: Hauser]
Trucker51 Offline
Member
MaleSurvivor

Registered: 05/20/08
Posts: 2826
Loc: Denver, CO
Perhaps you would enjoy living in Dallas or Houston, or San Antonio, or even El Paso??? Some of the things that Ron Paul says have some merit, and some of the things that he says I don't agree with. I still think that a consumption sales tax instead of an income tax with hundreds of loopholes would more-fairly tax the wealthiest among us while encouraging spending on all but the biggest-ticket items. You can certainly tell which side of the oil selling & burning crowd that Mr Paul stands on too. One other thing that all the naysayer Rupublicans, your Ron Paul included, always seem to forget, is that they will have to wait until November, 2012 to try to elect another President, and until November of 2010 to attempt to do anything about the balance of power in the Congress. And right now President Obama and the Democrats in Congress enjoy a sizeable majority in both popularity and electability.

Your whole rant is beginning to sound a lot like the fans of the Cleveland Browns or the Detroit Lions when they say: "Maybe next year". Either support the current administration as has been traditional in democratic politics here in America or get out there and start pounding the pavement knocking on doors, trying to tell everyone why your candidate is better for America, which is also a tradition here too. The chance that Ron Paul has of substantially effecting National economic policy is substantially less now than it was during the last election cycle.

Susan Boyle he is not!!!

Mark

_________________________
"We stay here, we die here. We've got to keep moving". Trucker Mark



Top
#290583 - 06/07/09 01:10 AM Re: The Obama Thread [Re: Trucker51]
FormerTexan Offline
Site Administrator
MaleSurvivor
Registered: 09/12/04
Posts: 11026
Loc: Denver, CO
I would like to suggest a departure from the "fair share" mentality. There is no such thing as "owing" income taxes. There is only the idea that we are charged by the government. We are billed. Something you owe is a liability for a service or product directly rendered, or from directly borrowing via contract (such as a mortgage). This idea that I make compensation for my labor, and somehow "owe" for this is a farce invented by crooked government in ages past. If I make no compensation for labor, then somehow I don't "owe" anything. Therefore it was never a true liability to begin with.

After finding out what my income tax goes for (interest on the national debt), I've concluded that with the idea of abolishing the phony debt comes with it the idea that paying interest on that debt is fraud against the people. There is no "fair-share" about it. I did not sign the note, nor did I consent to such a scam. Did any of the rest of you sign the note authorizing this national debt? Somehow I highly doubt it. Obama knows this is a scam, and should not be promoting "fair-share" mentalities. Ron Paul has the right idea - shut down the bankers' enterprise called the (un)Federal Reserve, and shut down its collection agency called the IRS, an organization which operates under the color of law.

_________________________
List of things ain't nobody got time for:

1. That


If I could meet myself as a boy...

Top
#290588 - 06/07/09 01:35 AM Re: The Obama Thread [Re: FormerTexan]
Trucker51 Offline
Member
MaleSurvivor

Registered: 05/20/08
Posts: 2826
Loc: Denver, CO
Still we as a nation have to fund all of our other programs with some form of taxation, even if we did as your desire and just abolished the national debt. I was watching a discussion on just abolishing the debt owed to bondholders over at GM and I must say that they weren't too happy. The GM bondholders have already organized and are going to fight in court, saying that in all previous bankruptcies that the bondholders got paid first. They are really unhappy that GM workers should end up with an ownership stake when the bondholders are getting shutout.

How do you think that our mostly Chinese bondholders would react if we told them to take a hike on repayment? My guess is that the end result wouldn't be much different than our Pacific war against Japan, which was mainly over our attempt to deny them access to raw materials and oil within their own sphere of influence. Are you willing to fight the Chinese to protect the interests of our people here at home?

We would still abolish the IRS if we went to a consumption tax (national sales tax) rather than an income tax.

_________________________
"We stay here, we die here. We've got to keep moving". Trucker Mark



Top
#290602 - 06/07/09 08:21 AM Re: The Obama Thread [Re: Trucker51]
Hauser Offline
Member
MaleSurvivor

Registered: 11/12/05
Posts: 2962
Loc: United States
Mark, I'll speak out once in a while in forums like this, or at the Denver Post and my hometown newspapers, etc, but be an activist I will not.

Mark? The ship of state is sinking. All the rich people are getting in the lifeboats and we the lowly working/middle-class are being locked in steerage. There is no saving this country. We're going the way of the 17th Century Spanish Empire, the 20th Century British Empire, and the Soviet Empire. We've learned NOTHING from history, and we've regressed as a society. There is no hope. I'm just going to ride it out as best I can. I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist.

My advice to the people; STOP LISTENING to Mainstream Media. We're not even CLOSE to riding out this economic turmoil, not even CLOSE. Time will prove me right.

As soon as this summer is over, and the Holiday Season seals the fate of even more commercial entities, ghost malls and vacant storefronts will dominate the landscape as we drive to the only employer still hiring. The only employer the will still be hiring will be the Government (if you're lucky and happen to know someone) or WalMart.

We deserve the government we get. We the American people ABSOLUTELY deserve this. WE are responsible for this. We have been bad Stuarts of the Government that is supposed to serve US. We have abdicated our responsibilities as citizens to be studiously informed about the true nature of government, the history of governments that run amok without regard to individual property rights, and completely ignoring the fates of Empires of the Past. It's already gone too far. It's just a matter of time now.

I can elaborate on how I arrived at this viewpoint if you wish.


Top
#290624 - 06/07/09 10:57 AM Re: The Obama Thread [Re: Hauser]
FormerTexan Offline
Site Administrator
MaleSurvivor
Registered: 09/12/04
Posts: 11026
Loc: Denver, CO
Quote:
Still we as a nation have to fund all of our other programs with some form of taxation


Many of those programs have no Consitutional authority to begin with, and should be abolished. The Congress has no authority in Article 1, Section 10 for the Dept of Education, healthcare, and several other sectors. Without authority, there is simply no need to fund them.

For those departments Congress does have authority for, well how did we do it before the income tax? Remember, the personal federal income tax goes only to pay interest on the national debt. This is hardly what I would call a "worthy program." Your personal federal income tax does not go to pay for any "service," almost all of which don't benefit me anyway.

How did we fund the legitmate programs before 1913 and 1941? How did this republic manage to fund their federal government from 1787 to 1941? We had tariffs, duties, imposts, excises. Along came 1913, and the 16th Amendment was declared law (it was not lawfully ratified, I have a copy of the book that demonstrates this). But, the personal federal income tax did not start until 1941, with the passage of the Victory Tax Act, to help fund the war. And even with this act, it was VOLUNTARY. But people used propaganda and coercion to get others to pay their "fair share." Even Donald Duck was in on the game.

As it stands, the personal federal income tax goes to enrich the private stockholders of the federal reserve bank. Is this what people want to fund? We always hear "tax the rich." The Fed stockholders are among the richest in the world. I'd say their windfall profits tax needs to be mighty hefty if we're to "tax the rich." But "tax the rich" never works. "Rich" is never defined in the public square. Some people think I'm rich.


_________________________
List of things ain't nobody got time for:

1. That


If I could meet myself as a boy...

Top
#290641 - 06/07/09 03:18 PM Re: The Obama Thread [Re: FormerTexan]
Trucker51 Offline
Member
MaleSurvivor

Registered: 05/20/08
Posts: 2826
Loc: Denver, CO
I would guess that a simple majority of Americans might say that both you and I are "rich", as we are both suburban homeowners living in above economic-average neighborhoods, and we drive newer cars that are paid for. Before the economic boom of the 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, etc, most urban Americans lived in much less expensive circumstance. Building the Interstate highway network and opening-up the suburbs to development was a large part of our suburban fortune, and also often contributed to the financial disparity often prevalent between many suburban residents and many less-fortunate inner-city residents. The cost of building the Interstate highways fell to Federal taxation. Should many increasingly less-fortunate inner-city residents have to pay to build and maintain Interstate highways that have increasingly stripped them of their jobs and lowered their economic outlook?

Conversely, should us more-fortunate Americans in the suburbs have to pay for inner-city public transportation when the primary beneficiary is those same less-fortunate inner-city residents, who also draw most of the welfare, AFDC, and food stamp benefits? Should us suburbanites have to contribute a heavy share of urban enterprise zone funding and Federal aid to formerly healthy inner-cities trying to draw jobs back to the economically displaced among us near downtown?

Both sides taxed their citizens in WW II, and both sides sold war bonds. And the civilians on the loosing side paid a heavy price, not only financially. Over time our rich have managed to insert many tax loopholes into tax code, while us middle-class taxpayers have only had some of the Democrats voicing some concern for us. That is one reason that I support a sales consumption tax over an income tax. If we paid a 10% Federal sales tax instead of our income tax, a $30,000 new car would incur a $3000 Federal tax liability. At the same time, a $5 Million Dollar house would incur a $500,000 tax liability. There wouldn't be any loopholes for the rich to exploit, no lobbyists corrupting Congress for tax breaks for their clients, no huge IRS bureaucracy to fund, no wealthy Americans getting away with not paying their fair share.

But to suggest that us less-wealthy Americans can somehow pressure Congress into dumping the national debt, by abolishing the Federal Reserve and declaring the debt null and void, is far-fetched, and would create huge enemies too. Just like us in the middle-classes, the Federal government can not continue to finance current spending by borrowing more and more money or just printing more and more money. In the former case we are increasingly mortgaging our future, and in the latter, our currency is increasingly devalued. The Bush Jr. administration doubled our cumulative nation debt to $10 Trillion, and left the Obama administration with a terrible mess to clean up.

What would you and Alan rather do, let half of the nation loose everything that they own and starve so that the other half can live an increasingly more-modest lifestyle? Maybe put a big wall up like in China to protect the more fortunate among us from the hordes of displaced poor? The Obama administration has been trying to encourage economic growth and has been updating our infrastructure, something that our previous administration neglected all across America. In some respects Obama's current policy is like Roosevelt's WPA and TVA projects, where Federal funds were used to provide jobs while building major public works thereby encouraging growth. Yes, already the Obama administration has proposed increasing our national debt by 30% to bail-out large areas of our nation that were hit hard by Bush administration neglect. But what is the alternative? Highways falling to pieces and major bridges falling down? How will that help our economy grow? Certainly there is the possibility that corruption, fraud, or waste will decrease the effectiveness of these programs, not unlike the history of our recent military spending in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Yes, let's force the rich to pay their fair share through a consumption tax. And let's continue trying to stimulate our economy so that the worst case scenario does not play out. Let's keep funding alternative fuels technology so that we can free ourselves from foreign oil. Let's keep funding environmental initiatives so that our planet remains a fit place to live. Let's not get engaged in blaming each other among us for ruining our narrow view of where we should head and who should take the fall to pay for it.

We can all find our freedom and enjoy greater financial freedom and security if we will just work together.

Mark



_________________________
"We stay here, we die here. We've got to keep moving". Trucker Mark



Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >


Moderator:  ModTeam, TJ jeff 

I agree that my access and use of the MaleSurvivor discussion forums and chat room is subject to the terms of this Agreement. AND the sole discretion of MaleSurvivor.
I agree that my use of MaleSurvivor resources are AT-WILL, and that my posting privileges may be terminated at any time, and for any reason by MaleSurvivor.