11362 Members
70 Forums
58059 Topics
409185 Posts
Max Online: 418 @ 07/02/12 06:29 AM
|
|
|
#201698 - 01/27/08 06:45 AM
Re: Blueshift's rant
[Re: blueshift]
|
Member MaleSurvivor
Registered: 08/03/07
Posts: 249
Loc: NY state
|
All I can say is I remeber feeling this way... I let it all go.
Like Mother Teresa said "In the end it's between me and God".
_________________________
When you stumble, make it part of the dance.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#201707 - 01/27/08 08:07 AM
Re: Blueshift's rant
[Re: Danbuff]
|
Member MaleSurvivor
Registered: 07/01/07
Posts: 851
Loc: Below the radar, USA
|
Blueshift, I couldn't agree with you more. If you study the Book of Job (which tells the story of the battle between good and evil) you can only come to the conclusion that the reason God allows evil to exist is to insure mankind's love of Him is pure and unselfish. If there were no evil, nobody would have any reason NOT to believe in God, and therefore would praise him only when they wanted his divine help. So, he did not kill Satan but only banished him, allowing him to still work his evil ways, so that through mankind's suffering and agony, God would know that the ones who still believed in him were believing in him For The Right Reason... http://jmm.aaa.net.au/articles/12576.htm"The Book of Job asserts that God acts for a reason for creating that evil. That reason is not punishment or character development. That reason is creation of a certain type of relationship between God and man. Evil is morally necessary to allow selfishness and selfless love to develop separately so that man can selflessly love God. If human beings know with certainty that God rewards those who love him, then human beings might be tempted to use God for their own ends. Selfishness corrupts selfless love. This claim is advanced through declarations by the author and by God of Job's virtual sinlessness (Job 1:1; 1:8; 2:3), Satan's first speech in heaven (Job 1:9-11) and God's acceptance of the terms of the test proposed. (Job 1:12: 2:6)" A kind and loving God? I don't think so. Lazarus
_________________________
"That which does not kill us, surely makes us stonger." - Neitsche
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#201775 - 01/27/08 02:19 PM
Re: Blueshift's rant
[Re: Lazarus]
|
Guest
Registered: 01/20/08
Posts: 1242
Loc: infinity
|
Yes, i am familiar with the book of Job. I'm quite familiar with most of the bible, really. It all paints this God as a very human and pathetic figure for someone who rules the universe and has lived for ever. I know mortal people who seem bigger in spirit than that God.
I often feel like i'm not quite accurate in saying that i am an atheist because it really depends on your definition of God whether i believe in it or not. I believe in a spirit that is in all that is created.. it is not "separate"(a meaningless word) and is not above the laws that are part of the fabric of existence.
Good and bad are two parts of one reality like the two sides of a coin.
Let me share a verse from the Tao te Ching that describes the being that i believe in.
" The great Tao flows everywhere, both to the left and to the right. The ten thousand things depend upon it; it holds nothing back. It fulfills its purpose silently and makes no claim.
It nourishes the ten thousand things, And yet, it is not their lord. It has no aim; it is very small.
The ten thousand things return to it, Yet it is not their lord. It is very great.
It does not show greatness, And is therefore truly great."
There are many translations of the Tao te Ching and it can be read many ways. Personally, though i like the translation i just quoted, i would change the word "small" to something like "humble".
Anyway, "the Tao" is the spirit that manifests as nature and i find the Tao much more lovable, respectable, and believable than the God of the bible.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#201930 - 01/27/08 11:46 PM
Re: Blueshift's rant
[Re: Danbuff]
|
Member MaleSurvivor
Registered: 06/02/07
Posts: 702
Loc: oregon
|
All I can say is I remeber feeling this way... I let it all go.
i like your comment because even though we disagree on what our beliefs are we both feel we "let it go" To me letting go was acepting the realization that there was no god. To you letting go was the complete opposite. Just wanted to point that out,  Christopher
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#201999 - 01/28/08 08:31 AM
Re: Blueshift's rant
[Re: John Ireland]
|
Member MaleSurvivor
Registered: 12/30/07
Posts: 2723
Loc: Washington State
|
John, You facinate me and I rejoice and howl with you in your victory over your monsters. Thank you for sharing.
Roger
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#202049 - 01/28/08 12:38 PM
Re: Blueshift's rant
[Re: Freedom49]
|
BoD Emeritus MaleSurvivor
Registered: 09/12/00
Posts: 667
Loc: Northern California Foothills
|
I was raised going to church only occasionally, probably 10-15 times a year. I remember seeing people there acting pious who I knew had done very unpious things. I moved around the country a lot as a kid and got a lot of different religious inputs. I came away from all of it believing that arguing over religion was like arguing over who has the best imaginary friend. If it gives someone comfort, that's good for them; if they believe in nothing, that's also good for them. Too many conflicts are waged and too many people have died about who's on the right side of the right god.
Steve
_________________________
I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center. Kurt Vonnegut (1922-2007)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|