I'm sorry, James, but I have to pipe up here.
This article is complete rubbish. It tries to place the blame of child abuse where it truthfully doesn't belong. It tries to tell us that children in co-habitating families are more likely to be abused when the fact is that these children were just as likely to be abused before the issues that caused the co-habitation to take place occurred. Plus, it completely ignores the fact that children are much less likely to disclose abuse that is perpetuated by their biological parents than they are to disclose abuse by a parent's boyfriend/girlfriend or stepdad/stepmom.
I'm also very disappointed with the "evidence" that was cited. If an article is going to cite a study, the author has some sort of responsbility to supply some of the data that went into the study instead of just saying, "David Finkelhor's uncited evidence gives this opinion". What the article fails to mention is that this same David Finkelhor has also published several studies that say that as many as 40% of abuse perpetrators are women, yet this article consistantly places the blame on men.
I want to see some data that I can make an attempt to refute, not just posting some opinions on some people who are allegedly experts in the field. There is no evidence of anything in this article. Just improperly cited gibberish.
Revenge is nothing more than another way of perpetuating abuse.
What the world needs now
Is some new words of wisdom
Like la la la la la la la la la.
Having a friend who will keep a secret for you is worthless compared to a friend who won't keep a secret from you.